Trek FX S 4 Women’s 2017
2017 Urban
Estimate price |
1,099$
Weight | 10.03 kg 
Bike details
Overview
Key information split into simple groups.
Bike summary
-
-
Frame Aluminum -
Wheels 700c -
Groupset R350, Tiagra -
Suspension Rigid -
Drivetrain 2 × 10 -
Brakes Rim
Parts list
Components
Main components, grouped by system.
Bike components
Frame
Frame
WSD FX Alpha Gold Aluminum, DuoTrap S compatible, rack and fender mounts
Suspension Fork
Bontrager Nebula, carbon
Drivetrain
Rear Derailleur
Shimano RD-R350
Front Derailleur
Shimano Tiagra
Shift Levers
Shimano Tiagra, 10 speed
Cassette
Shimano Tiagra, 11-34, 10 speed
Crank
Shimano R460, 48/34
Bottom Bracket
Sealed cartridge
Chain
KMC X10
Pedals
Nylon body w/alloy cage, toe clip & strap
Wheels
Front Hub
Formula TK31 alloy
Rear Hub
Formula TK32 alloy
Rims
Bontrager Tubeless Ready
Tires
Bontrager AW1 Hard-Case Lite, 700x28c
Brakes
Brakes
Tektro alloy linear-pull brakes, Tektro adjustable-reach alloy levers
Cockpit
Stem
Bontrager Elite, 31.8mm, 7 degree, w/computer & light mounts
Handlebar
Bontrager Satellite Plus IsoZone, 31.8mm, 15mm rise
Grips
Bontrager Satellite IsoZone Plus, lock-on, ergonomic
Headset
VP Slimstak, sealed semi-cartridge bearings
Seat
Saddle
Bontrager H1 WSD
Seatpost
Bontrager SSR, 2-bolt head, 27.2mm, 12mm offset
Fit data
Geometry
Numbers for sizing and ride feel.
| Size | 13" | 17" | 15" | 19" |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bottom Bracket Height | 285 mm | 285 mm | 285 mm | 285 mm |
| Trail | 73 mm | 70 mm | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Top Tube Length | 528 mm | 537 mm | 542 mm | 551 mm |
| Seat Tube Angle | 75 ° | 74.5 ° | 74.5 ° | 74 ° |
| Seat Tube Length | 330 mm | 432 mm | 381 mm | 483 mm |
| Head Tube Angle | 70 ° | 70.5 ° | 70.5 ° | 70.5 ° |
| Head Tube Length | 115 mm | 150 mm | 115 mm | 160 mm |
| Chainstay Length | 443 mm | 443 mm | 443 mm | 443 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1051 mm | 1053 mm | 1055 mm | 1062 mm |
| Standover Height | 664 mm | 730 mm | 691 mm | 765 mm |
| Wheels | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
Model Overview
FX S 4 Women’s is a Trek Fx model. 128 bikes variations carry this model name so far. Check out the entire range from 2017 of this model, by clicking this link.
Model range prices
The most economical model, the Trek FX 2017 has a starting price of 379$. Trek FX S 6 2017 on the other hand is the most expensive at 2099$.
Safety
When you go for a ride, don’t forget to put your helmet on. Moreover, ride with traffic, not against it. This will help you stay visible to drivers and also makes it easier for them to see you.
Fitness bikes average price
Our math shows that the average cost of a dependable Fitness bike is 656$. However, even if your budget is less than the average, you might still be able to get a top-quality Fitness bike. In conclusion, always check bike reviews and their components before making a purchase to make sure you don’t overpay.
Furthermore, if we have a quick look at this model’s cost, we can see that at its release date the price was 1099$. Comparing this to the average Fitness bike price, we see that the price is 67.53% more expensive.
Average weight for Fitness bikes
Fitness bikes have an average weight of 11.24 kg (24.78 lbs). Having an easier bike than average will give you a great advantage on climbs. However, a heavier bike will gain more speed on descends.
Trek FX S 4 Women’s it’s weighing 10.03 kg (22.11 lbs). At this weight, is considerably lighter than average. In conclusion, the average Fitness bike weighs 12.06% more than FX S 4 Women’s.
Overview of components
Fork material
The fork on this bike is made out of carbon, so, it’s a great addition to the bike’s value. However, carbon forks should be regularly inspected for damage because even the smallest crack could cause the fork to fall apart.
Wheels size
The wheels on FX S 4 Women’s are the 700c aluminum type. These are the most popular wheels for road, aero, gravel, cyclocross, race, and gravel bikes. However, while they give you great speed and control, these wheels are not so bump-friendly.
Brakes
When you want to stop the bike in time, the brakes are vital. The FX S 4 Women’s has Rim brakes. Rim brakes deliver an average performance overall. However, they are not nearly as effective as hydraulic brakes are.