Bike details
Key information split into simple groups.
Bike summary
-
-
Wheels 700c
-
Groupset Ultegra, Shimano
-
Suspension Rigid
-
Drivetrain 2 × 11
-
Brakes Rim
Parts list
Main components, grouped by system.
Bike components
Frame
Frame
RIDE CF2
Suspension Fork
Road carbon Race
Drivetrain
Rear Derailleur
Shimano Ultegra GS
Front Derailleur
Shimano Ultegra D
Shift Levers
Shimano Ultegra
Cassette
Shimano CS-5800-11 11-32
Crank
Shimano RS500 50-34 (BSA)
Bottom Bracket
BSA, 68mm, threaded
Chain
KMC X11
Wheels
Rims
Fulcrum Racing 7
Tires
Continental Grand Sport Race 25 fold
Brakes
Brakes
Shimano R561
Brake Levers
Shimano Ultegra
Cockpit
Handlebar
FSA Gossamer compact OS
Headset
FSA BB410P/No.55E
Seat
Saddle
Prologo Kappa 3
Seatpost
MERIDA carbon H SB15 27.2
Fit data
Numbers for sizing and ride feel.
| Size | 44cm | 47cm | 50cm | 52cm | 54cm | 56cm | 59cm | 62cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stack Reach Ratio | 1.45 mm | 1.45 mm | 1.47 mm | 1.49 mm | 1.55 mm | 1.61 mm | 1.64 mm | 1.61 mm |
| Bottom Bracket Height | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm | 271 mm |
| Front Center | 588 mm | 588 mm | 586 mm | 587 mm | 587 mm | 596 mm | 611 mm | 636 mm |
| Rake | 44 mm | 44 mm | 45 mm | 45 mm | 46 mm | 45 mm | 45 mm | 45 mm |
| Trail | 70 mm | 70 mm | 63 mm | 60 mm | 56 mm | 57 mm | 57 mm | 57 mm |
| Stack | 548 mm | 548 mm | 561 mm | 573 mm | 593 mm | 617 mm | 641 mm | 660 mm |
| Reach | 379 mm | 379 mm | 382 mm | 384 mm | 382 mm | 384 mm | 392 mm | 411 mm |
| Top Tube Length | 524 mm | 524 mm | 536 mm | 546 mm | 556 mm | 571 mm | 586 mm | 611 mm |
| Seat Tube Angle | 75 ° | 75 ° | 74.5 ° | 74 ° | 73.5 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° |
| Seat Tube Length | 440 mm | 470 mm | 500 mm | 520 mm | 540 mm | 560 mm | 590 mm | 620 mm |
| Head Tube Angle | 71 ° | 71 ° | 72 ° | 72.5 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° |
| Head Tube Length | 150 mm | 150 mm | 160 mm | 170 mm | 190 mm | 215 mm | 240 mm | 260 mm |
| Chainstay Length | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm | 416 mm |
| Wheelbase | 995 mm | 995 mm | 993 mm | 994 mm | 994 mm | 1003 mm | 1018 mm | 1043 mm |
| Bottom Bracket Drop | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm | 65 mm |
| Standover Height | 776 mm | 799 mm | 820 mm | 839 mm | 858 mm | 879 mm | 907 mm | 933 mm |
| Wheels | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
Model Overview
RIDE 5000 is part of the Merida Ride model. Merida released 74 bikes variations of this model so far. Check out the entire range from 2016 of this model, by clicking this link.
Safety
When cycling always take safety very seriously. Wear a helmet, obey the traffic rules and wear hi-vis clothes. In short, take care of yourself so others can take care of you.
Average price for Endurance bikes
Our math shows that the average cost of a dependable Endurance bike is 2346$. However, you could also get a good Endurance bike even if you pay a lower amount than the average price. In short, before purchasing your ideal bike do some research about its components, and also check for reviews online.
Average weight for Endurance bikes
If we make a quick analysis of the average weight of an Endurance bike, we get 8.2 kg (18.08 lbs). An easier bike will give you a big advantage in climbs. However, a heavier bike can gain speed when you descend.
equally heavier with average, RIDE 5000 has a weight of 8.2 kg (18.08 lbs). In conclusion, the average Endurance bike weighs 0% less than RIDE 5000.
RIDE 5000 components
Fork material
RIDE 5000 has a carbon fork, so, it’s a great addition to the bike’s value. However, carbon forks should be regularly inspected for damage because even the smallest crack could cause the fork to fall apart.
Wheels size
When leaving the production line, the RIDE 5000 model has 700c aluminum wheels. These are the most popular wheels for road, aero, gravel, cyclocross, race, and gravel bikes. However, these wheels don’t perform so well when passing over obstacles.
Brakes
When you want to stop the bike in time, the brakes are vital. The RIDE 5000 has Rim brakes. Rim brakes are cheaper than hydraulic brakes, and also easier to maintain. However, they are not nearly as effective as hydraulic brakes are.
