Bike details
Overview
Key information split into simple groups.
Bike summary
-
-
Frame Carbon -
Wheels 700c -
Groupset Ultegra Di2 -
Suspension Rigid -
Drivetrain 2 × 11 Electronic -
Brakes Rim
Parts list
Components
Main components, grouped by system.
Bike components
Frame
Frame
C:62 Advanced Twin Mold Technology Aero Frame, Direct Mount Caliper Brake, Road Aero Endurance Geometry
Suspension Fork
CUBE CSL Evo Aero C:62 Technology, Aerodynamic Direct Mount Caliper Brake, 1 1/8" / 1 1/4" Tapered
Drivetrain
Rear Derailleur
Shimano Ultegra Di2 RD-8050-DSS, 11-Speed
Front Derailleur
Shimano Ultegra Di2 FD-R8050-F
Shift Levers
Shimano Ultegra Di2 ST-R8050
Cassette
Shimano Ultegra CS-R8000, 11-28T
Crank
Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000, Hollowtech II, 50x34T, 170mm (50/53cm), 172.5mm (56/58cm), 175mm (60/62cm)
Chain
Shimano CN-HG700-11
Wheels
Rims
Fulcrum Racing 44 Aero, QR/QR
Tires
Reifen Grand Prix 4000S II Kevlar, 25-622
Brakes
Brakes
Shimano Ultegra BR-R8010, Direct Mount
Cockpit
Stem
Newmen Evolution 318.4, 31.8mm
Handlebar
Newmen Advanced Wing Bar, Carbon
Headset
FSA I-t, Top Integrated 1 1/8", Bottom Integrated 1 1/4"
Seat
Saddle
Selle Royal Asphalt
Seatpost
Newmen Advanced, 27.2mm, Carbon
Fit data
Geometry
Numbers for sizing and ride feel.
| Size | 50cm | 53cm | 56cm | 58cm | 60cm | 62cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stack Reach Ratio | 1.38 mm | 1.41 mm | 1.46 mm | 1.5 mm | 1.51 mm | 1.56 mm |
| Bottom Bracket Height | 263 mm | 263 mm | 265 mm | 265 mm | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Front Center | 583 mm | 591 mm | 604 mm | 612 mm | 623 mm | 634 mm |
| Rake | 47 mm | 48 mm | 49 mm | 48 mm | 48 mm | 49 mm |
| Trail | 63 mm | 59 mm | 55 mm | 56 mm | 56 mm | 55 mm |
| Stack | 529 mm | 550 mm | 579 mm | 598 mm | 613 mm | 635 mm |
| Reach | 384 mm | 389 mm | 396 mm | 400 mm | 405 mm | 408 mm |
| Top Tube Length | 528 mm | 544.5 mm | 566 mm | 581 mm | 596 mm | 606 mm |
| Seat Tube Angle | 74.6 ° | 74 ° | 73.5 ° | 73 ° | 72.5 ° | 72.5 ° |
| Seat Tube Length | 440 mm | 470 mm | 500 mm | 520 mm | 540 mm | 560 mm |
| Head Tube Angle | 71.5 ° | 72 ° | 72.5 ° | 72.5 ° | 72.5 ° | 72.5 ° |
| Head Tube Length | 120 mm | 140 mm | 170 mm | 190 mm | 208 mm | 231 mm |
| Chainstay Length | 418 mm | 418 mm | 418 mm | 418 mm | 418 mm | 418 mm |
| Wheelbase | 990 mm | 998 mm | 1012 mm | 1020 mm | 1031 mm | 1042 mm |
| Bottom Bracket Drop | 73 mm | 73 mm | 71 mm | 71 mm | 69 mm | 69 mm |
| Wheels | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
About this model
AGREE C:62 SL completes the Cube Agree model. 36 bikes variations carry this model name so far. You can easily view all of the Cube Agree bikes models from 2018, here.
Safety
When cycling always take safety very seriously. Wear a helmet, obey the traffic rules and wear hi-vis clothes. In short, take care of yourself so others can take care of you.
Aero bikes average price
Our math shows that the average cost of a dependable Aero bike is 4211$. However, you could also get a good Aero bike even if you pay a lower amount than the average price. As a general rule of thumb, you should always read reviews about the bike and its components before buying it to ensure you don’t pay too much.
Aero bikes average weight
Aero bikes weigh an average of 7.34 kg (16.18 lbs). Having an easier bike than average will give you a great advantage on climbs. However, a heavier bike will gain more speed on descends.
Weighing 7.4 kg (16.31 lbs), the AGREE C:62 SL model is slightly heavier than average. To sum up, it’s 0.82% heavier than the average weight of Aero bikes.
Overview of components
Fork material
The fork is made out of carbon, so, it’s a great addition to the bike’s value. However, carbon forks should be regularly inspected for damage because even the smallest crack could cause the fork to fall apart.
Wheels size
The wheels on AGREE C:62 SL are the 700c aluminum type. These wheels are the most used kind for road bikes in general. However, these wheels don’t perform so well when passing over obstacles.
Brakes
We ride faster and faster, so a good braking system is essential on a bike nowadays. The AGREE C:62 SL comes with Rim brakes. Rim brakes deliver an average performance overall. However, they are not nearly as effective as hydraulic brakes are.