Vitus Razor VRL 2015
Bike details
Key information split into simple groups.
Bike summary
-
-
Frame Aluminum
-
Wheels 700c
-
Groupset Sora
-
Suspension Rigid
-
Drivetrain 2 × 1
-
Brakes Rim
Recommended size guide.
48cm
154cm - 160cm
50cm
160cm - 165cm
52cm
165cm - 170cm
54cm
170cm - 175cm
56cm
175cm - 152cm
Parts list
Main components, grouped by system.
Bike components
Frame
Frame
6061-T6 Alloy
Suspension Fork
High-modulus T700 HM-UD carbon, Alloy steerer
Rear Shock
n/a
Drivetrain
Rear Derailleur
Shimano Sora 3500
Front Derailleur
Shimano Sora 3500, 31.8mm band
Shift Levers
Shimano Sora 3500, 9-speed
Cassette
Shimano HG300, 9-speed, 11t-28t
Crank
Shimano Sora 3450, 50tx34t
Bottom Bracket
Shimano Octalink
Chain
KMC, 9-speed
Wheels
Front Hub
Vitus alloy, 100mm, QR
Rear Hub
Vitus alloy, 135mm QR
Rims
Vitus alloy
Spokes
Stainless
Tires
Kenda, 700c x 25c
Brakes
Brakes
Tektro R315, Dual pivot, long reach
Cockpit
Stem
Vitus, 3D forged 6061-T6 aluminium, + / - 6 degree rise
Handlebar
Vitus compact, 6061 Alloy
Headset
Token TK410M, Integrated, 1.1/8”
Seat
Saddle
Vitus, ladies specific
Seatpost
Vitus, 6061-T6 alloy, 15mm offset, 27.2mm x 350mm
Fit data
Numbers for sizing and ride feel.
| Size | 48cm | 50cm | 52cm | 54cm | 56cm | 58cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stack Reach Ratio | 1.44 mm | 1.43 mm | 1.46 mm | 1.46 mm | 1.48 mm | 1.45 mm |
| Stack | 529.8 mm | 541.1 mm | 557 mm | 566.6 mm | 576.1 mm | 590.5 mm |
| Reach | 368.8 mm | 378.6 mm | 380.9 mm | 387 mm | 389.7 mm | 407.3 mm |
| Seat Tube Angle | 74.3 ° | 74.3 ° | 73.8 ° | 73.5 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° |
| Seat Tube Length | 440 mm | 460 mm | 480 mm | 500 mm | 520 mm | 540 mm |
| Head Tube Angle | 72 ° | 72.5 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° | 73 ° |
| Head Tube Length | 120 mm | 130 mm | 145 mm | 155 mm | 165 mm | 180 mm |
| Wheelbase | 985 mm | 994 mm | 996 mm | 1005 mm | 1011 mm | 1033 mm |
| Wheels | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| Rider Min Height | 154 cm | 160 cm | 165 cm | 170 cm | 175 cm | cm |
| Rider Max Height | 160 cm | 165 cm | 170 cm | 175 cm | 152 cm | cm |
Model Overview
Razor VRL belongs to the Vitus Razor model. Vitus launched 58 bikes of this model so far. You can get a glimpse at all models from 2015, by clicking on this link.
Model range prices
Vitus Razor 2015 is the cheapest bike model and costs 668$. Vitus Razor VRS 2015 is the most expensive one and costs 911$.
Safety
When cycling always take safety very seriously. Wear a helmet, obey the traffic rules and wear hi-vis clothes. In short, take care of yourself so others can take care of you.
Endurance bikes average price
According to our math, the average price for a trustworthy Endurance bike is 2346$. However, even though the average price of an Endurance bike is lower, you might still be able to get a top-quality bike. As a general rule of thumb, you should always read reviews about the bike and its components before buying it to ensure you don’t pay too much.
Furthermore, if we have a quick look at this model’s cost, we can see that at its release date the price was 789$. Doing a quick comparison, we notice that Razor VRL price is 197.34% lower than the average cost of an Endurance bike.
Endurance bikes average weight
On a deeper look, we notice that the average weight of an Endurance bike is 8.2 kg (18.08 lbs). It is a good advantage to have a lighter bike than the average. However, a heavier bike is more efficient on descents.
With a weight of 9.44 kg (20.81 lbs), Vitus bike is much heavier than average. In conclusion, the average Endurance bike weighs 15.12% less than Razor VRL.
Razor VRL components
Fork material
Razor VRL has a carbon fork, so, it won’t add up to much weight to your bike. However, the price you have to pay for a carbon fork is considerably higher.
Wheels
The wheels on Razor VRL are the 700c aluminum type. These are the most popular wheels for road, aero, gravel, cyclocross, race, and gravel bikes. However, these wheels don’t perform so well when passing over obstacles.
Brakes
When you want to stop the bike in time, the brakes are vital. The Razor VRL has Rim brakes. Rim brakes deliver an average performance overall. However, they are not nearly as effective as hydraulic brakes are.
